Saturday, September 3, 2011

The Rules of the Game

Agents, editors and writing “teachers” (is that an oxymoron?) all have their own nifty set of rules: Never do this. Always do that. Be careful of… Avoid too many commas. Try to not use “that” if the sentence reads fine if it is eliminated. Don’t begin a sentence with “And” or “But.” The list goes on and on. Pay strict attention to these rules and you could wind up with a severe case of writer’s constipation.

If Jack Kerouac had adhered, he’d probably never have written a word and wound up teaching Latin, geology, the fine art of drinking cheap wine or just sitting on the rocking chair in his mother’s house watching the seasons change. But Kerouac was not one to be told how to express himself. Like a lot of other great writers, Kerouac followed his inner voice even when people were screaming at him to conform. He didn't even use a typewriter the way other novelists did.

The standard typewriter back then just wasn't suitable for Kerouac's style. He wrote very fast in a sort of jazz riff, so he had no patience for changing paper. Instead, he had a roommate who was an AP writer steal one of the long spools of paper used back then in wire service machines. Those machines would teletype news that rolled off and cascaded to the floor in one long piece containing multiple stories. Copy boys would then use a scissor to cut up the stories and deliver them to the appropriate editors.
Armed with this big AP roll (think toilet paper custom-made by Charmin for Goliath) he'd hook it up the cylinder of his typewriter and start the music, writing and writing and never having to pause from his rhythm to pull out paper and insert another page. Rules weren't for Jack, who wrote some of the longest sentences every put on paper, often a paragraph or more, using commas whenever it suited him.

The point of this riff/rant is that some of the best and brightest have ignored rules and done quite well. When I was laboring under the dos and don'ts, I felt they constricted the flow and rhythm of my words. One day, feeling especially frustrated, I decided to leaf through the novels of my two favorite mystery writers, Michael Connelly and Lee Child. To no great surprise they broke many of the rules, and it wasn't just because they were bestselling authors who could do as they please. They were faithful to their own style which was evident early in their careers. 

Sure there are certain elementary rules which theoretically are necessary to writing a novel or a screenplay: have a beginning, middle and end; define your characters early and have them change and go through an “arc;" don’t telegraph what’s going to happen next or 40 pages down the line, let it come out gradually and surprise the reader. Etc...

But that being said, history has shown us that style trumps even these basics, in both novels and film. Orson Welles’ in the 1941 classic movie “Citizen Kane” abandoned linear narrative in favor of a then radical mosaic structure which was more suited to the telling of his story. Nine years after Kane, the great Japanese director Akira Kurosawa -- undoubtedly influenced by Welles (as he was by many Western directors) -- created one of his masterpieces, “Rashomon,” in which a crime is recounted from five different witnesses, each having their own perspective on what actually happened. (Rashomon was most recently copied in the American movie "Courage Under Fire," starring Denzel Washington and Meg Ryan, and pilfered by other filmmakers).

The lesson? There is no lesson. If you're a writer who turns to the craft to express emotions and ideas without regard to the “Voice” telling you: “Don’t,” then money is not the main reason you took up the insane act of putting words onto paper in the first place. Sure, it’d be great if you got the big bucks down the line, but mostly you do it in the beginning to just be “you” in print, not the person your parents, peers or teachers expected you to be.

Well, I guess I’m wandering, another rule no-no. Where is my tight, coherent string of thought? Hell if I know. I’m a rogue writer. I live in the “Void,” a place where chaos and random events shape lives, creative writing, and in a larger sense, the planet. If you have realized I have absolutely nothing instructive to say about writing, go read Dear Abby, Page Six of the NY Post or the National Enquirer in order to find true wisdom. Me? I'm going to move on now to much more important things, like structuring my Netflix queue, checking out what my very few friends are saying on Facebook and immerse myself in email. I mean, let’s get our priorities straight!

2 comments:

  1. Hi Nat! Fiction that plays 100% by the rules reads like a biology textbook without the fun pictures. It doesn't work and I can't think of one book worth reading that follows every single rule religiously.

    Rebel that I am, my big bad is starting sentences with "and" and "but". It's the way my lead character talks. She indecisive and neurotic, so she'll say one thing and then qualify or dispute it two seconds later with an "and" or a "but". I try not to overdo it, but this is just one instance in my case that it doesn't work to follow the rules.

    Go rogue, my main man.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're the best, Jen! I love using And or But, especially And, because as you say certain characters in fiction and real life talk that way. Carry on!

    ReplyDelete